Home > Find The > Find The Error In The Proof That 2=1# Find The Error In The Proof That 2=1

## 2=1 Proof

## Prove 1+1=3

## Bitte versuche es später erneut.

## Contents |

Thus, by induction, **N horses are the same** colour for any positive integer N. Pseudaria, an ancient lost book of false proofs, is attributed to Euclid.[3] Mathematical fallacies exist in many branches of mathematics. The latter applies normally to a form of argument that is not a genuine rule of logic, where the problematic mathematical step is typically a correct rule applied with a tacit Positive and negative roots[edit] Care must be taken when taking the square root of both sides of an equality. weblink

If a = 0 then b should also be equal to 0 because we considered a = b at the beginning. Would be much appreciated!? And remember to become a fan of the Math Dude onFacebookwhere you’ll find lots of great math posted throughout the week. Nächstes Video A Proof that 0 = 1 (Can You Spot the Mistake?) - Dauer: 3:33 patrickJMT 225.048 Aufrufe 3:33 40 "Proofs" of a Flat Earth: A Rapid Fire Response - http://140.121.196.53/lincc/courses/al99/ans/Homework_1_Answer.pdf

Anmelden 10 Wird geladen... Jump to Navigation ôô **Explore TopicsProductivityCategoriesEmailLearningMeetingsOrganizationProject ManagementTime ManagementFeatured Content How** to Edit Your Own Writing like a Pro 30+ Apps to Help You Work Less and Do More The reasons that .999... = 1 - Dauer: 10:01 Vihart 1.364.314 Aufrufe 10:01 Disproving Gravity... Trending What s greater .8 or 0.8? 236 answers How long is eternity? 181 answers Math Help? 13 answers More questions Is infinity times infinity greater than infinity? 29 answers HELP

- In particular, when x is set to π, the second equation is rendered invalid.
- Multivalued functions[edit] Many functions do not have a unique inverse.
- Not so fast!What if I was to tell you that I could prove that 1 + 1 is actually equal to 1.
- Wird verarbeitet...
- The error is here: ((x+y)(x-y)/(x-y))=(y(x-y)/(x-y)) Because we know that x=y So x-y = 0 And we cannot divide by zero. ⌂HomeMailSearchNewsSportsFinanceCelebrityWeatherAnswersFlickrMobileMore⋁PoliticsMoviesMusicTVGroupsStyleBeautyTechShoppingInstall the new Firefox» Yahoo Answers 👤 Sign in ✉ Mail
- But nuts or not, these are exactly the things we'll be talking about today.Of course, there will be a trick involved because 1 + 1 is certainly equal to 2…thank goodness!
- This one's a classic, but people usually don't bother with the explanation, letting morons argue about it in the comments.
- Anzeige Autoplay Wenn Autoplay aktiviert ist, wird die Wiedergabe automatisch mit einem der aktuellen Videovorschläge fortgesetzt.
- ISBN0-486-20789-7.
- Well-known fallacies also exist in elementary Euclidean geometry and calculus.

And while it's perfectly fine to divide both sides of an equation by the same expression, it's not fine to do that if the expression is zero. Die Bewertungsfunktion ist nach Ausleihen des Videos verfügbar. ISBN978-1-4008-3029-9. Prove That Papa=mama Would you think I was kind of nuts?

Such an argument, however true the conclusion, is mathematically invalid and is commonly known as a howler. Prove 1+1=3 Hinzufügen Möchtest du dieses Video später noch einmal ansehen? Expand» Details Details Existing questions More Tell us some more Upload in Progress Upload failed. http://mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/faq.false.proof.html But, you say, that's not dividing by zero—it's dividing bya -b.

Melde dich bei YouTube an, damit dein Feedback gezählt wird. Mathematical Fallacies Complex exponents[edit] When a number is raised to a complex power, the result is not uniquely defined (see Failure of power and logarithm identities). In this case it implies a = –b and should read 5-9/2 = -(4-9/2), which, by adding 9/2 on both sides, correctly reduces to 5 = 5. If we were additionally given the fact that any two horses shared the same color, we could correctly induct from the base case of N = 2.

One value can be chosen by convention as the principal value, in the case of the square root the non-negative value is the principal value, but there is no guarantee that We'll talk about two reasons today.The first has to do with how division is related to multiplication. 2=1 Proof Video should be smaller than **600mb/5 minutes** Photo should be smaller than **5mb** Video should be smaller than **600mb/5 minutes**Photo should be smaller than **5mb** Related Questions Try to find an How To Prove 2+2=5 We don't know what it is, but we'll just assume thatx is some number.

Somewhere buried in that "proof" is a mistake. http://a1computer.org/find-the/find-this-error.php Maxwell, E. Wähle deine Sprache aus. Its like you can't cancel the factor (a-b) from both sides of the equation if a=b. Prove 1=0

See how many tries it takes you to correctly identify the fallacious step! Maths induction proof? This quantity is then incorporated into the equation with the wrong orientation, so as to produce an absurd conclusion. check over here There is a distinction between a simple mistake and a mathematical fallacy in a proof: a mistake in a proof leads to an invalid proof just in the same way, but

For N = 1, the two groups of horses have N − 1 = 0 horses in common, and thus are not necessarily the same colour as each other, so the 2 For 1 Meaning i.e. We can also look at this division problem as a multiplication problem asking what number,x, do we have to multiply by 0 to get 10?

with Stupid - Dauer: 25:45 Martymer 81 37.781 Aufrufe 25:45 NephilimFails at interpreting the Bible - Dauer: 11:51 Martymer 81 28.106 Aufrufe 11:51 "Prove" 2 = 1 Using Calculus - Dauer: Clearly when the square root was extracted, it was the negative root −2, rather than the positive root, that was relevant for the particular solution in the problem. Consider for instance the calculation (anomalous cancellation): 16 64 = 16 / 6 / 4 = 1 4 . {\displaystyle {\frac {16}{64}}={\frac {16\!\!\!/}{6\!\!\!/4}}={\frac {1}{4}}.} Although the conclusion 16 64 = 1 2^0 I did all the necessary requests and it still does not go no.?

Wird geladen... In fact, O always lies at the circumcircle of the △ABC (except for isosceles and equilateral triangles where AO and OD coincides . Answer Questions I have a problem. 775-problem communicating with dish. this content In elementary algebra, typical examples may involve a step where division by zero is performed, where a root is incorrectly extracted or, more generally, where different values of a multiple valued

Draw line OR perpendicular to AB, line OQ perpendicular to AC Draw lines OB and OC By AAS, △RAO ≅ △QAO (∠ORA = ∠OQA = 90; ∠RAO = ∠QAO; AO = Then I'll show you why this "proof" is indeed, as you suspected, ridiculous. Navigation Panel: Go up to Classic Fallacies index Go down to first subsection This is Not the Fallacy Go forward to 1=2: A Proof using Complex Numbers Switch to text-only version Therefore, when you say to divide both sides by a - b is wrong because you can't divide by zero.

In order to avoid such fallacies, a correct geometric argument using addition or subtraction of distances or angles should always prove that quantities are being incorporated with their correct orientation. Like many other mathematical fallacies, our proof relies upon the subtle trick of dividing by zero. Here's how it works:Assume that we have two variablesa andb, and that:a =bMultiply both sides bya to get:a2 =abSubtractb2 from both sides to get:a2 -b2 =ab -b2This is the tricky part: And therefore that 2 = 1.

The traditional way of presenting a mathematical fallacy is to give an invalid step of deduction mixed in with valid steps, so that the meaning of fallacy is here slightly different Hope this helps! proofs theory-of-computation algorithms asked Sep 15, 2015 by rdiachenko Please log in or register to add a comment. 1 Answer +1 vote Best answer you can't divide by (a-b) if Extract of page 207 ^ Maxwell 1959, Chapter VI, §I.1 ^ Maxwell 1959, Chapter VI, §II ^ Nahin, Paul J. (2010).

It's obviously 2, right? Unanswered Tags Users Ask a Question All Activity Q&A Questions Hot! x=y X^2=xy X^2-y^2=xy-y^2 (x+y)(x-y)=y(x-y) ((x+y)(x-y)/(x-y))=(y(x-y)/(x-y)) X+y=y Y+y=y 2y=y (2y/y)=(y/y) Algebra-> Proofs -> SOLUTION: Find the error in this proof that 2=1. Atoria · 8 years ago 0 Thumbs up 1 Thumbs down Comment Add a comment Submit · just now Report Abuse a=b or a-b=0 you can not divide a quantity by

Beyond pedagogy, the resolution of a fallacy can lead to deeper insights into a subject (such as the introduction of Pasch's axiom of Euclidean geometry[2] and the five color theorem of Buri · 8 years ago 0 Thumbs up 0 Thumbs down Comment Add a comment Submit · just now Report Abuse False proof. Where does it occur? Wird geladen...

Step 2: Then , Step 3: , Step 4: , Step 5: , Step 6: and .

© Copyright 2017 a1computer.org. All rights reserved.